Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre Tribulation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Rapture. --Ezeu 21:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an unencyclopedic opinion piece and will never be more than a POV fork of Rapture. This article should either be deleted, or, as an alternative, changed to a redirect to Rapture. BigDT 12:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Rapture as suggested, as the term can be seen but there is no need to duplicate information. -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 13:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect works. No need to merge as the contents are clearly POV. Gwernol 13:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, way too POV —Mets501^talk 15:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect: As per BigDT, the Rapture article has a section on Pre-tribulation. Any relevant information should be merged, followed by a redirect. —ERcheck @ 16:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - since the consensus is redirect, can I blank the content and redirect it myself or does an administrator need to do that? BigDT 16:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since nobody has said anything, I'm going to be bold and go ahead and blank this page and redirect it. BigDT 20:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well ... never mind ... obviously, I can't do that ... somehow it doesn't seem to work ... can an administrator do it? BigDT 20:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• RD' to rapture Newyorktimescrossword 02:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.