Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predereferencing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 04:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Predereferencing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Prod removed. It wasn't the most valid prod, granted, but nonetheless the article does not meet notability criteria. Perhaps redirect to Parrot virtual machine, but no additional coverage is warranted at this time (if ever). Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 04:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nn - blog reference not reliable source. Fails WP:V Sting au Buzz Me... 05:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this term is clearly not notable, also as Sting mentioned blogs do not count as reliable sources and as such this article fails WP:V. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Also fails WP:NEO. The lone ref merely indicates who did the coining. No notability. Tim Ross·^talk 23:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.