- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is clear on notability and the quality of referencing —SpacemanSpiff 04:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Preity Uupala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't satisfy notability criteria for entertainers WP:NACTOR IMDB shows only 5 titles for her as an actress in short films and a TV series with a budget of $20,000. She has no credits as a film producer as far as I can see. The entrepreneur bit refers to her biography on IMDB which is the rehashed version of this article (or the other way around). The "current Miss India international AP 2012" is not referenced at all. TangMH (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
my conclusion is that Preity Uupala is definately notable. I jhave taken the liberty of googling her and did some research to find an array of foriegn press on her. She certainly satisfies the notability criteria to be on wikipedia. not just for acting, but for other activities at large. You posted how is this person notable?, well this person is famous around the world on different levels- looks like she has had major fame in countries like China, russia and france. Wikipedia has entries for small time models/ actors, relatively speaking, Ms. uupala more than qualifies, with respect to all her achievements to date on a global scale. Jmcafferty (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)— Jmcafferty (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep
Preity Uupala is notable around the world for various achievements. there are far less notable individuals on Wikipedia , for example actors who have had one movie only or one tv show etc. Just Google preity Uupala and you can see the hundreds of thousands of pictures and articles come up. i mean this person was is hugely notable in China and all asian countries for being awarded film awards by Jackie chan himself. She was on the front cover of several newspapers and blogs due to this. known by millions of people in that region. She also has had extensive coverage in Russia for a film event as well. If you read her bio, she has achieved much in media eye and much has been written about her. It seems that her page has largely been improved in the recent times, removing some of the irrelevant stuff. her page could be better written, but her achievements and credibility cannot be questioned. Wikipedia is about notable people, famous people who are known in public and media eye- and she has more than proved that.
Mshorr (talk) 08:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This BLP is an overly promotional advertisement created by part of the Nickaang sockfarm featuring lies and exageration. She was not "awarded 3 film awards, presented by Jackie Chan, at the Asia Pacific Film Festival", she just collected them for the people who actually won them as they were not able to attend. Poorly sourced deceptive promotional BLPs do not belong here. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:07, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: puffery and other advertising. Multiple claims are unsubstantiated, and others are categorically untrue. The subject fails to pass Wikipedia's test for notability. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 04:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Definitely doesn't pass Wikipedia's test for notability as an actor:
She doesn't have "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Not even one of her films is notable. She doesn't have "a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." She hasn't "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangMH (talk • contribs) 20:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.