- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Premier Biosoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't see this meeting WP:CORP, and it smacks of spam as well...however, I wanted input from others. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 22:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 23:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 23:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup — not blatant spam, but the sources seem to be there, so I think all is needed is cleanup. MuZemike (talk) 03:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 01:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP -- a Gnews search reveals 40 or so hits, all of which appear to be press releases or advertisements by the company, thus failing the criteria for "significant coverage" in secondary sources independent of the subject. The WP:SPAM aspects only make it worse. RayAYang (talk) 03:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - somewhat poorly written, but refs are compelling. Needs copyediting, mostly. I don't think it's spam - just written by an inexperienced user - their contribs bear this out, and there's no need to be bitey. WilyD 10:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:CORP as RayAYang and others have noted. CorpITGuy (talk) 13:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.