Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier Model Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Premier Model Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising The Banner talk 23:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is not written in a Neutral Point of View. It contains promotional language and doesn't seem suitable for an encyclopedia. Vaca tion 9 13:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Prune -- If it is really one of the "top modeling agencies", it probably ougfht to have an article. Its founder has an article. However this reads far too much like an ADVERT. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Stub to one sentence based on a combination of insidious promotional text, and copyright issues arising from the close paraphrasing vs. [1]. Neutral as to notability, but the content is unsalvageable. --j⚛e decker ^talk 03:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failure to meet the WP:NPOV policy. The article is in problematic state for over three years and nothing has been done to rectify the problems since it was nominated for deletion 22 days ago. --Pink Bull 18:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.