- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Preston Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An internet search came up with just one independent source for this company, and it only pertained to a new type of crane that they had just obtained in 2021. The company fails WP:VERIFY as well as WP:CORPDEPTH for broad geographic coverage. If it has been in existance since 1969 it should not have been hard to find independent coverage for this company if they are a major player in their business. Blue Riband► 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Blue Riband► 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. Could not find indepth significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 02:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.