Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Price Benowitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bearian's argument, while not unreasonable, has not gained consensus here, and isn't codified to the extent that it can override the other arguments. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Price Benowitz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGCRIT. The RS which mention the firm don't mention it as a subject of their article. One of the partner of the firm being notable doesn't cut it. - Harsh (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - Harsh (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. - Harsh (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no coverage of the firm, just couple lawsuits it has been involved in. Renata (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article does not show enough coverage to pass notability. Nika2020 (talk) 00:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Its sources are a mixed bad - Avvo is not a reliable source - but on the whole, decent. According to my standards, they are possibly notable based on their cases, but I understand that my opinion on this matter is not necessarily the majority consensus. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the reliable secondary sources presented in the article cover the subject in any depth, and a search found nothing of substance further. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.