Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principal clock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Principal clock

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Principal clock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a definition. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTDICT Spiderone 08:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, however Wiktionary is, and this appears to meet their inclusion criteria, so it'd be worth a transwiki in my opinion. SITH (talk) 10:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to Wikitionary. Foxnpichu (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTDICT. If moving the content to Wikitionary is an option, go for it, but remove the page from this encyclopedia, as it is not a dictionary. Footlessmouse (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.