Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Printz Board Credits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No chance in hell: SNOW. Drmies (talk) 05:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Printz Board Credits

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an article; list of works of a possibly non-notable person without their own article. Printz Board has many mentions in reliable sources, but seemingly little significant coverage, and either way, an article would be called for before an unformatted list of works. (declined PROD) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable, doesn't even bother to have a sentence explaining what it is Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT. Note also that Printz Board (2011 afd) is red, removing any possibility of context. Kilopi (talk) 03:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.