Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priority information aproach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priority information aproach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OR and an essay, not valid as an article here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The language could use some cleanup, as well, but the topic itself does not appear notable, and that's the key concern. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 21:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy. First off, it's misspelled; it should be "Priority information approach". Secondly, finding any good sources to prove its notability will be difficult - it generates minimal Ghits and there are no scholarly articles free online, nor are there any books on the topic. Perhaps it is just too new a topic for inclusion. Bearian (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.