Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prit piyu ne paneter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prit piyu ne paneter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Referenceless article on a topic which is unclear if notable, written in a manner which makes it difficult to understand what the topic is. | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 08:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no valid content and most certainly not notable. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have looked for sources, thinking that a "famous drama" from the 1960s should have left some kind of trace in English-language sources, but I've found absolutely nothing. That is, there is a play by that name, and I've found plenty of advertising for a recent production of it; I think this article was created as part of that advertising, and also in order to promote Ragi Jani (there's been several attempts to promote him on Wikipedia before). If reliable third-party sources should appear about the play itself, as opposed to the current production, it would be a good addition to Wikipedia. However, the article would have to be rewritten from scratch in any case. --bonadea contributions talk 08:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote it a bit to make it clear that the article is about the play, not about the producer. Still not notable, though. --bonadea contributions talk 09:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a borderline speedy delete on the grounds that it makes virtually no sense. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it's so unclear I can't figure out which delete sorting pages to transclude this debate onto. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and WP:SALT. There are no sources to establish its notability. This article has been previously speedy deleted twice, but gets recreated. Coderzombie (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should be salted. Also, for the record, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hariharmahadev. --bonadea contributions talk 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting this investigation. I am more than familiar with various socks attempting to create various versions of Ragi Jani page. Coderzombie (talk) 10:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coderzombie (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Salt. --Elton-Rodrigues 20:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.