- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article written by user of the same name (vanity/spam). This website has been briefly mentioned/linked to in a few articles, but I would consider these "trivial" with regards to press coverage. Most of the information in the article is original research or at best not using reliable independent sources. Almost all information seems to be either from (possibly) the editors experience or from the website. Delete per the above reasons. Wickethewok 03:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Created as an advertisement, and non-notable. Also, qualifies as vanity. Picaroon9288 18:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity/spam Clubmarx 18:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete What part of Wikipedia is not an advertising service do you not understand? --Xrblsnggt 19:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Aye. Mceder 03:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Ladlergo 17:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.