Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProGet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Discussion indicates sources to meet minimum notability under current standards. RL0919 (talk) 21:47, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ProGet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

ProGet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is promotional and based on primary sources. I wasn't able to find sigcov (see google news, google scholar), similar articles written by the user about Inedo (company) and its software products have previously been deleted by AfD. Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:GNG per nom. User about Inedo (company) and its software products have previously been deleted. Also logo for Inedo only see

  

  Image with questionable encyclopedic content from Inedo

  for more logo details. 49.151.187.185 ^talk 14:29, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: There is some coverage in Google Books, brief tutorial here, brief setup instructions here. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:10, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get review of Helpful Raccoon's sources please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There is in-depth independent WP:SIGCOV in these two books: [1] and [2]. Best.4meter4 (talk) 01:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: A slim WP:GNG pass based on the sources surfaced by 4meter4. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.