Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proactive security
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted, copyright infringement: RSA Security CryptoBytes Vol3, #1 ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/cryptobytes/crypto3n1.pdf WP:CSD#G12 —dgiestc 04:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Proactive security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The more the author adds to this page, the more it becomes promotional. The text of this article now mimics the link it cites at the bottom. Fcsuper 16:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Besides appearing promotional, the link shows that the majority of the article is COPYVIO. -Seidenstud 17:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in agreement with above. I don't think it's blatantly ad-like for speedy, but it seems that's the purpose of the page in any event. In a completely unencyclopedic tone nonetheless. Someguy1221 19:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Transwiki - Keep and add applicable article improvement templates, or transwiki to Wikibooks as a stub. --Remi 12:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated - The arcticle has been updated and reviewed once again. 17:08, 27 April 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.25.124.146 (talk) 14:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Appears to be a legitimate topic but article is unabashedly promotional and may be copyvio (unless the author is one of the authors of the linked paper?). May be best to start over from a clean slate.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.