- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Prodcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced neologism, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and an internet search reveals this word used in many different ways. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 20:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular T · C 20:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article is about the word "Podcast." There is no indication of special social significance beyond that of an ordinary word. It does not even have the interest of many lexicographers writing about its significance to the English language. In short it does not match the precident for exceptional inclusion established by truthiness.--Fartherred (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Looks like it might be a joke. Shadowjams (talk) 02:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.