Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Crossword Generator
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Professional Crossword Generator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software. I am also nominating Professional Crossword Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for the same reason. Both were nominated for speedy deletion but did not fit the criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This user has created, so far, not just Professional Crossword Generator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Professional Crossword Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), but also Professional Crossword Software project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This is getting absurd. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Nonsense article(s). Tavix (talk) 22:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both … no WP:RS to WP:V … only "reference" is subject's website, which says that this is a "project" that is still in development … Happy Editing! — 72.75.91.179 (talk · contribs) 22:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I had nominated for CSD. But software is not a category... Anyway. AFD it is... ChiragPatnaik (talk) 02:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everybody. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 20:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.