Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profile Defenders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Profile Defenders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable business. Not the "first" of anything, and inclusion of prices, etc shows more promotion than anything. I fail to see anything remotely encyclopedic about this business. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 09:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Probably a useful honey pot article. Keep this one in good shape and we can see who whitewashes it, and see what else they whitewash. This would arouse suspicion of conflict of interest if the edits are uniformly whitewashing. -- ke4roh (talk) 17:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we do that? Sounds POINTy to me. --BDD (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No, we don't do that. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we do that? Sounds POINTy to me. --BDD (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom as a non-notable organisation. Keri (talk) 07:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 23:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is no coverage in independent reliable sources. I can only find press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 13:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.