Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progress and Freedom Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Monty₈₄₅ 02:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progress and Freedom Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability shown Artem Karimov (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - insufficient information about the organisation, scholars, research, policy intiatives. Fails notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Defunct organization, but there is a lot of source material out there [1], none of which is currently in the article. That could be fixed. An interesting article could certainly be written about this "foundation" and its close/controversial association with Newt Gingrich ("the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a research organization closely allied with the incoming House Speaker" --New York Times 1995). Could be redirected to Newt Gingrich (where it is currently not mentioned) but I think it would be more valuable to keep and rewrite the article. If the result is "keep", I will undertake the updating and rewriting. --MelanieN (talk) 00:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, redirect to Newt Gingrich which is the same as delete. Artem Karimov (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and expand. This was a notable organization providing cover for Speaker Gingrich's views, and also if I remember correctly, weighed in on early Internet policy. Jonathanwallace (talk) 09:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.