Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Politics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedily redirected. Jkelly 21:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page was created a month and a half ago and yet still contains almost no content. The statement at the beginning of the article is entirely POV, and as I said on the discussion page, is an idea with which a great many people would disagree. Regardless, he has had ample time to expand and improve the article, and has not done so. I propose its deletion. Charles 06:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Possible Redirect to Progressivism?. Artw 06:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Artw. Nearly Headless Nick 08:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Progressivism per Artw. --Coredesat 09:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Deli nk 12:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect -- perfectly reasonable search string, no real need to delete the content. Jkelly 18:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have no problem with a redirect. But, I have to ask, what content are you suggesting we not delete? The content, as it were, amounts to one sentence. ---Charles 18:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- I'm suggesting that there is no need to delete the article. Just turn it into a redirect as an editorial decision. Jkelly 19:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- Your point is taken. The redirect is done. This AfD can be closed. ---Charles 19:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- I'm suggesting that there is no need to delete the article. Just turn it into a redirect as an editorial decision. Jkelly 19:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have no problem with a redirect. But, I have to ask, what content are you suggesting we not delete? The content, as it were, amounts to one sentence. ---Charles 18:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.