The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ProjeQtOr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has not received coverage in reliable secondary sources. The article in the French Wikipedia (created yesterday) contains the same references. I could not find additional sources in French or English. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't be a book concidered as a reliable second source ? Démarche et outil de gestion de portefeuille de projets informatiques

Here are some other references, that were not included in the article to keep it clear :

Any advise about links that could be included in the article is Welcome.

Babynus (talk) 10:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC) Babynus[reply]


Only to say that we use ProjeQtOr inside our organization in Quebec, Canada.

§Simon Tremblay 17:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bidou (talkcontribs)


Please see contribution in Talk as well.
Cleverchild (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  20:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (yak) @ 20:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Maybe jmmbb contribution to the article would rather take place here, in the discution. Any advice ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.237.206.127 (talk) 21:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.