- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. While sources were offered, the consensus of the discussion is that reliable sources were lacking. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Project'Or (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet the general notability guidelines. OSborn arfcontribs. 00:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some links that may help evaluate Project'Or notability
Independant references :
- http://www.pearltrees.com/#/N-p=27639490&N-u=1_409152&N-fa=3565938&N-s=1_3568246&N-f=1_3568246
- http://www.salto-consulting.com/tag/sonar/
- http://wiki.framasoft.info/PropositionNotice/Projectorria
- http://wapedia.mobi/fr/Project'Or_RIA
- http://www.yakakliker.org/index.php?title=Applications/Gestion_de_projet&bc=0
- http://www.barre.fr/blog/index.php?post/2011/06/10/Quelle-solution-pour-g%C3%A9rer-ses-projets
- http://yannsymons.com/index.php/mes-favoris/demos-de-logiciels-libres/
- http://www.d-a-l.com/help/general-internet-issues-questions/69927-trying-install-open-source-application.html
- http://hailp.org/?q=node/39
- http://forum.partipirate.org/travaux-technique/gestionnaire-projet-t5969.html
Individual CVs :
- http://www.viadeo.com/profile/00284yj00b2p219
- http://www.amplement.fr/nathalie-gruillot
- http://www.emi.ac.ma/emiste/CVs_Ing_EMI_2011/Informatique/Syst%C3%A8mes%20d'information/Moumin-Cv.pdf
External deployement of tool (not sure what they stand for) :
- http://we-interact.com/projectorria/view/main.php
- http://stitchmage.com/servers/gold.qmuxs.com/htdocs/view/main.php
- http://highautomation.com/pj/projectorria/
Hope it helps. pascal.bernard 16 November 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 15. Snotbot t • c » 19:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 00:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The sources above do not show notability. SL93 (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete: Internshit report of product usage, by Simon AUBRY, showing notability : :http://www.deltaprod.free.fr/files/IIE3-STAGE-simon.aubry.pdf
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All of these references seem to be from forum posts and non-notable blogs. I don't see any real news mentions. Graymornings(talk) 22:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete: see Internshit report above. In french. Explicit reference similar to book or "non internet" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babynus (talk • contribs) 16:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete None of the links at the article or provided here seem to provide significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The "internshit" (really?) report seems to be simply a consultant report; all it does is confirm that the software exists. None of the other links are from independent reliable sources. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.