- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Project 2000 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable building that was never built. A search for "Project 2000", at least for me, turns up some medical-related thing, which is definitely not this. The building appears to fail WP:GNG. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete fails WP:GNG. All Google News search results are for a Microsoft Project 2000. Adding Bofill to "Project 2000" search yields no results. In a general search (with Bofill) there are some scraps, but nothing featuring this subject.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 13:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article from 2006 about a building project that states ... however it was never built. Fails WP:GNG. Only found sources are one web site and one forum, both confirm that the project was cancelled. --Ben Ben (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.