Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Brokerage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Fastily as "(G2: Test page)". Non-admin closure — Frankie (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Brokerage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and I question whether it conforms to the general notability guidelines. Ceradon ^talk_contribs 17:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article's talk page says:

I have completed my Masters in Information Management at Victoria University, NZ. I am proposing to proceed to doctorate research around these concepts.

My hypothesis is that information and technology consumers are now flooded with information and options, the roles of information classification and brokerage will become more important to the consumer.

At the project level this means that mainly project sponsors and owners, but also any stakeholders, now find that they are be negotiating with multiple project managers and members from many companies and organisations in many countries. A project broker will provide this negotiation and brokerage service.

I would like to use Wikipedia to develop this framework with people in the global community.
— User:Geeklee 22:52, 13 January 2012‎

It sounds as though he wants a wiki to work with other people to develop his framework—but Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.