- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Bueller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:N. Second reference is a blog, which knocks it out of "multiple independent sources". SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed on all points. I also want to point out that the coverage in both sources is brief. I also found a reliable source using the same term "Project Bueller" to refer to a completely different project: [1]. All this points me to recommend to Delete. Cazort (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, sources are only cursory mentions and limited to blog-type postings. I would consider New York Magazine a WP:RS, but not necessarily its online blog, especially when there is no other significant coverage. Also, WP:NOTNEWS, especially for events that fell through... maybe a reverse crystal ball? :P --Kinu t/c 19:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a float/event in a parade is not notable, and lack of mainstream and notable sources confirm that. First Light (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Potential future event which would make a nice little legacy-type aside paragraph to Ferris Bueller's Day Off if it ever happens. Delete with a smile. Carrite (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Carrite. Joaquin008 (talk) 16:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.