- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Goth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company; no reliable, independent secondary sources. Miracle Pen (talk) 07:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no attempt at asserting notability, probably would have qualified for speedy.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 06:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable.--Grahame (talk) 01:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.