Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Sanctuary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project Sanctuary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Psychbabble with insufficient sources available to establish notability. The article on its proponent has already been deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Win Wenger), and this article should go as well -- the only sources are written by the "inventor" of these ideas (Silvia Hartmann). This is the sort of thing that sometimes gives wikipedia a bad name... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Lacks any independent, reliable, third-party sources and thus fails notability guidelines. MastCell ^Talk 22:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Turns up no usable google hits and has no reliable sources (or any sources, for that matter), Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 19:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.