- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pigman☿ 04:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Topaz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-natable -- Alan Liefting-talk- 21:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I suggested a merge with New Zealand Police quite some time ago, and no one showed up to comment until AL yesterday, so I suspect no one cares much about this article.-gadfium 00:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. —gadfium 00:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 00:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or better yet Merge with New Zealand Police. -RiverHockey (talk) 00:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-merge. Police forces will have many internal projects with a range of code names. Unless the projects become significant or notable, then judgment needs to be made about including mention of them within an article. This looks like a piece of internal morale boosting - all police forces investigate threats against staff. Many non-police organisations will do the same. The mention of Project Topaz comes from a page on Safety First in the local police force internal newsletter. This is highly trivial. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 16:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.