Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Wilderness
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Project Wilderness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed by creator. No reliable sources to indicate the article meets the guidelines for inclusion. A google news search didn't turn up much. tedder (talk) 01:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In its current state, Delete. The duration of this AfD is plenty long enough to allow the creator to dig for good references and make me change my mind. A request for such a break is, as a matter of fact, what saved this article from speedy deletion. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no showing of notability Racepacket (talk) 02:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Blanchardb. However, if article is improved to the point where notability is established, then I will change my !vote accordingly. ArcAngel (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. This organization is only a few months old, and already it has a Wikipedia page? Seems like it should accomplish something before it attains notability. On the other hand, I'm surprised at how quickly (3 days) this article has traveled from start-up to deletion. Most articles are put up with far less information, and are expanded as more editors log in. Yoninah (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't cite any coverage in reliable sources to satisfy notability, and I can't find any. Hut 8.5 15:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.