- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ronhjones under criteria G11 and G12. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Projectionism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable arts terminology. Also, the article itself fails to comply with WP:GNG, WP:V and WP:DICTIONARY in which Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Mediran (t • c) 02:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of [1]. freshacconci talktalk 04:54, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.