Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projector Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Projector Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor record label. Article without references since 2005. XXN, 15:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Swister. Nothing sources found for verifiability. No indication the label has made any cultural impact through length of operation or releases by notable artists. No other indications of notability such as GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the only link was its official site and it is not working either. D4iNa4 (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all of the above.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 18:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.