Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projekt Horizont

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. · Katefan0^(scribble) 16:19, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An incomplete expedition isn't sufficiently notable (may become so if completed?). Also, the ending of the article looks like vanity to me. CLW 05:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reserved This is a difficult one. It's not easy to verify, but if it can be, it is probably worthy of inclusion. --Apyule 07:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But is it really worthy of inclusion before the actual expedition has been completed? CLW

Well, to me this is more about being able to verify its existence than worthiness at this stage. --Apyule 02:40, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• A private expedition with no stated goals looks much like vanity to me, so delete Pilatus 14:57, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Eitelkeit. / Peter ^Isotalo 16:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the article can be rewritten if and when the expedition is completed. -- Kjkolb 05:00, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for now. The subject of the article is real (ie: not hoax). From the provided website, it appears that the expedition did receive some news coverage (ie: more than 20 different media organzations - hence at least some third party deemed it to be "interesting"). I agree, though, that the end of the article seems vanity - which suggest it to be tag for NPOV or for cleanup. --Hurricane111 13:56, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.