Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prolix inventions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 03:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a nonse term, even if Shakespeare is the "nonce". Small websearch results, and generally bad page. Dangherous 20:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per nom. Mangojuice 17:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Stifle (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stifle (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP is not a dictionary, and there doesn't seem to be any forseeable way to expand the content.--Andrew c 23:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No content that isn't implied by prolix and invention separately. Peter Grey 05:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.