Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 07:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined an A7 tag on this because it looks like a nationally important chain (in a non-English speaking country), but the tagger wants to edit war over it, so here we are. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. A7 tagger also es-equivalent of PRODed the eswiki version recently. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional keep per [1] and [2]. Keep is provisional because I do not read Spanish, so cannot evaluate these sources for quality. I'd suggest that anyone searching limit their searches to "site:.pe"; I found that useful in refining the results. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Google Translate or Bing Translate does a fair job at translation. From what I can see though, in my opinion the references do not meet the criteria for establishing notability. The first talks about the opening of a new store (based on information provided by the company at various times), fails WP:ORGIND as this is not "Independent Content". The second talks about a survey on name recognition and says the company performs well at this, but this reference fails WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

10:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article without encyclopedic relevance, should have been improved by adding more information and references, Rodney Araujo Tell me - My contributions 20:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.