- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Promat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete, I wasn't sure on this one was on the edge of speedy. I believe ultimately even though they hold patents for products loads of people/companies have patents and not all are notable. I think it fails WP:ORG. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Utterly lacking in independent sources, and none seem to be available via Google search either. - Biruitorul Talk 20:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence found of notability. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- This looks like an advert for a company in Romania, making engineering equipemnt for railways, and holdiong a series of patents. While it is a very poor article, I cannot determine whether the company is notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.