Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promise the Children
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. There was nearly a consensus to delete. Redirecting and keeping the history allows someone to carry out a merge (the other possible outcome of this debate) if they wish. Petros471 13:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was tagged for speedy as nn-group, but as there is uncertainty if it qualifies, I am listing it here instead. Discussion on the talk page indicates some (but possibly insufficient) independent coverage. Delete unless better explanation of notability makes it into the article. Kusma (討論) 08:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. WP:NOT -article initiated by User:PromiseTheChildren - wiki is not a soapbox.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohconfucius (talk • contribs) 09:29, 8 August 2006
- Should all the other UU orgs be deleted? keep. UtherSRG (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- if not delete, perhaps they should all be merged into Unitarian Universalist. Not every fringe group under an umbrella organisation deserves an entry. WP:NOT wiki is not a directory Ohconfucius 10:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge As I explained on the talk page, unique google hits are very low, even for their old name. They seem to be mentioned in passing in a few places, but no obvious coverage.--Crossmr 14:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.