- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Promness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Scapler (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — nothing more than a dictionary definition. That is what Wiktionary is for. MuZemike (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Crap like this is what Urban Dictionary is for. JuJube (talk) 04:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- probably suitable for wikitionary.Teeninvestor (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Prom if sufficient usage can be found. Otherwise, delete, as it fails WP:NOT#DICT.--Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism, more kids trying to validate stuff by having a Wikipedia article on it. JuJube (talk) 04:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.