- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. It has been argued that the subject of the article is notable, but the article was too poor (substub/advertising). The deletion is therefore without prejudice against a better article, and I will let the redlinks stay.
Hardly any content, looks like advertisment. Unless someone can verify notability as defined in WP:CORP, delete. S.K. 18:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The company has been published in a third-party news service, and is hence notable as defined in WP:CORP, Section 1, Subheading 1. Link: Supply Review Article. Arviragus 19:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Hmm, the example you gave looks like a case of Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself which are excluded. But then, it probably is a matter of discussion. S.K. 19:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as substub advert. Stifle 12:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.