Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propagandamatrix.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web), and brief. Some assertion of notability, so not speedy. The author is also up for AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Joseph Watson. Delete The JPS ^{talk to me} 13:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infowars.com

• Keep One of the most prominent 9/11 truth movement websites--Striver 14:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete no demonstration of any wider, independent notability as per the cited guidelines.--cjllw | TALK 14:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Not enough notability, per Wikipedia:Notability (web). --Aude (talk | contribs) 14:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -non-notable, only 44,000 on Alexa traffic ratings. Madman 15:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not sufficiently notable for an encyclopaedia. Zaxem 17:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not sufficiently notable for mention beyond Alex Jones (radio) article. --mtz206 17:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One of the most prominent 9/11 truth movement websites? Even more of a reason to delete it! --mboverload 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think i need to change that to "one of the more notable". However, your arguement is a invalid one for deleting. --Striver 19:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't call my arguement invalid, you're the sole person who wants to keep it. I perfer that trash not be on wikipedia. Not notable, nothing you can't get anywhere else, shouldn't have been made. --mboverload 00:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Paul Joseph Watson. I'd say "merge and redirect," but all the information in this article is already contained in that one. --Hyperbole 19:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete conspiracycruft. Danny Lilithborne 21:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unwarranted promo. Give it a single mention on Alex Jones (radio) and let it go at that. KleenupKrew 21:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 22:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pleaase--Burg Hambler 23:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:WEB -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 08:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.