Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propellerhead Software (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete G4, recreation of deleted material SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Propellerhead Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:NOT and WP:CSD#g4. Article was speedily deleted (5th time) and salted yesterday per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propellerhead Software. It was subsequently restored, unfortunatly the sources added fail WP:RS. The sources added are not independant of the company, both propellerheads.se, and rebirthmuseum.com are ownwed by Propellerhead Software. This Strenthens the previous AFD consensus that this article is in fact Non-notable and just advertising. the others seem to be merely trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Hu12 00:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. Still spam, even if it's now honey-roast spam. =) Salt because the page has been recreated multiple times. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt. This was speedied and the page was supposed to have been salted. Dbromage [Talk] 02:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt per reasons mentioned above, and the prior AfD spazure (contribs) (review) 06:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt per nom ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 06:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy, so tagged. ADMIN: PLEASE SALT! Giggy\Talk 06:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.