Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proper Doh Downloads
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete It will reach it soon enough
Delete. A disputed PROD (without any comment at all by the anonymous disputer) on a forum with fewer than 1000 members, no other assertions of notability (and anyway AfD needs much more than a mere assertion) and no apparent media coverage, significant listings. Does not register at all on Alexa. -Splashtalk 18:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and assertion of non-notability in article (states under 1,000 members). --Fuhghettaboutit 18:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn-forum Catherine breillat 19:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable forum per WP:WEB. "For all of the Simpsons Fans out there, this is the perfect site for you [...] Sign up today." Advertising much? --Kinu t/c 19:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with above. Although it is close to 1000 members, not yet notable enough. --Scott 21:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, it reads like an advertisement. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 00:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly nn. Mikker ... 15:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.