Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proprietary technology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Proprietary technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Redundant description of Proprietary with a twist specifically on "technology". Stub article and I can't even find any really good sources for it as a dictionary definition. Jimmi Hugh (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 14:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Most of what is worth repeating (along with a deal of uncited material) is at Vendor lock-in, but a redirect would be tendentious. William Avery (talk) 13:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article consists of a one sentence WP:DICTDEF. The concept is covered elsewhere (see William Avery's comment). VG ☎ 01:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I don't think the article is about vendor lock-in, but technologies that are developed by organizations for their own internal use. For example, "Google uses proprietary technology in their data centres to reduce energy consumption". I don't know if it can be expanded beyond a dictionary definition though. Rilak (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dictionary definition. WillOakland (talk) 20:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant and a dicdef. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 11:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.