Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protopia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protopia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism with minimal coverage in secondary reliable sources. I tagged with notability during NPP and explained to the creator my concerns, but haven't seen improvement since then. Most of the sources I could find were from blogs or the original article itself. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A couple bloggers picking up the term does not notability make.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Neologism that never gained traction. Jergling (talk) 16:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.