Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Provenance Digital Media
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:53, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Provenance Digital Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Surely fails notability. Rd232 talk 01:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not seem to pass WP:COMPANY. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- ??? [1] is significant coverage. Is the quality of the source satisfactory per WP:NOTE? Chester Markel (talk) 01:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I would not consider this type of local coverage (note that there is a "_______ Business Journal" for many cities) to be sufficient in itself to establish notability. Many publications offer free coverage to potential advertisers. SeaphotoTalk 03:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability not established. Local coverage only (see above comment), first 10 pages of Google hits are press releases, blogs and the like. SeaphotoTalk 03:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another digital marketing boutique agency. Also advertising: ...has constantly approached its concept of transparency and openness with welcome arms to the local marketing community - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.