- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This contested PROD seems to be a neologism. Joyous! | Talk 23:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is. Delete. B.Wind 03:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not in Websters, so don't put it in wiki. In any event, it's a dicdef and more likely candidate for wiktionary. Ohconfucius 04:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Ev. transwiki to wiktionary, but it seems not enough used. -- Cate 12:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this article is excellent AND the usage in the South makes it such a word... showing the diversity of cultures in the United States. It should not be deleted for this reason alone.
- comment - words go to wiktionary not to wikipedia. Cate | Talk 09:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.