- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tyrenius 17:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Proyecto 'ace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested speedy, might be notable, but probably not. - Jehochman Talk 21:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and it's written like an ad. JonathanT•@•C 22:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 13:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Johnbod (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Jonathan. freshacconcispeaktome 22:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. - Modernist (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Shows some press coverage, but it seems to be pretty minor. Mostly self promotion. Kind of spammy. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.