Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prunicolor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Specific epithets are by definition WP:partial title matches, and do not warrant a disambiguation page as none of species are known by the term alone. There is no entry that might serve as a redirect target in either List of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names or Wiktionary. Paul_012 (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Disambiguations. Paul_012 (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names, now that there is an entry there (I've just added it). I suggest it would be more helpful to the reader to add entries to that list before suggesting dab pages like this for deletion. PamD 10:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I wasn't familiar with the list article's inclusion criteria, so I didn't add them myself. Now that there's an entry, I would support redirecting accordingly. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete see discussion for Pes-caprae; I personally think that a disambig is unsafe because it overrides the result of a search but will return an incomplete set of links (if the disambig page hasn't been adequately maintained). But PamD tells me that the disambig result actually includes the possibility of viewing the search results instead - I just can't find this option - so I may change my !vote if I find it! Elemimele (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]