Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudonomenalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:42, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified original research. The only reference given is to a Wikipedia mirror, with the exact contents of this article. Cleanup date expired. Google shows 739 links, most of which are also from Wikipedia mirrors. Sikon 12:41, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Do any of the references below Quantum mind#pseudonomenalism provide verification? Uncle G 13:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't think so. No articles [1], and no books [2] on this topic. Unverifiable. Delete unless precise references are provided. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 19:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as per nom (and *hoowhee!!!!* is there ever a bunch of codswallop available for viewing over in Quantum mind!!!) Pete.Hurd 02:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.