Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull a jim

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED by Dmcdevit. -Splash 22:18, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense and vanity. (Speedy?) KeithD (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pull a jim. Speedy or otherwise. Alf 21:43, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Silliness (nn, or). -- BD2412 ^talk 22:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense DV8 2XL 22:18, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy - take your pick - patent nonsense or re-creation or probable attack page? --Doc (?) 22:49, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied. Re-creation. Zoe 05:27, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.