- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pull platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
If this has any meaning, I cannot figure it out. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as well disguised but still non-notable neologism coined by Harry Katzan, Jr. and John Hagel - zero news hits, zero indication that the wider business world uses this term at all. Don't be fooled by the book search hits with this term, a closer look reveals they are published by ReadHowYouWant.com and iUniverse, both on-demand publishers. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Push–pull strategy. It seems to be the same concept. Merge any worthwhile cited material. Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There doesn't appear to be any worthwhile cited material, unfortunately. It looks like something two guys made up one day, to be honest. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.