Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulse Community Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pulse Community Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously nominated for speedy. Limited claim for notability and no reliable sources can be found. The website linked when the article was originally a few weeks ago seems to have disappeared. — Rod ^talk 12:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• DELETE - original article was copyvio cut-n-paste of station's website. Was stubbed to remove copyvio and little has been done to the article since. I cannot find any reliable references for the site - neither on the Internet, nor in any local media (I live in the station's target area and have never heard of it). Given the COI that exists with the article's creation, I support nomination for deletion as non-notable. --Simple Bob (talk) 13:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheWeakWilled (T * G) 02:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)r[reply]

• Delete no reliable sources. There seems to be at least two other stations calling themselves "Pulse Community Radio", and while the other two (one in Australia) are at least theoretically more notable than this one, I'm not seeing any reliable sources for any of them. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.